This is a work, and the author’s right to a work under international law comes into force from the moment the work is created.

Comparative Table

Characteristic	Standard Raptor	Modified Raptor + solid fuel paste	Change (%)	Comment
Thrust Parameters
Sea-level thrust	2200 kN	2700-2900 kN	+23-32%	Increase due to additional energy density of solid fuel
Vacuum thrust	2400 kN	2950-3200 kN	+23-33%	Proportional increase
Specific impulse (sea level)	330 s	310-325 s	-1.5-6%	Slight decrease due to solid component addition
Specific impulse (vacuum)	350+ s	330-345 s	-1.5-6%	Slight decrease compensated by increased thrust
Technical Parameters
Combustion chamber pressure	270+ bar	280-300 bar	+4-11%	Pressure increase due to additional combustion energy
Combustion temperature	~3500°C	~3700-3850°C	+6-10%	Increase due to high energy density of solid fuel
Propellant flow rate	650-700 kg/s	800-870 kg/s	+23-31%	Increased mass flow rate with solid component inclusion
Component ratio	O/F = 3.5-3.8	O/F = 3.0-3.3 + solid comp.	Modified	Optimized for three-component combustion
Operational Characteristics
Thrust regulation range	40-100%	35-120%	Expanded	Improvement due to spiral dosing system
Start-up time	~3 s	~2-2.5 s	-17-33%	Faster ignition due to high ignition energy
Restart capability	Yes	Yes, limited	Slight reduction	Depends on solid component reserve
Operation duration	Limited by fuel	Limited by solid component or fuel	Configuration dependent	Can be used in various modes
Structural Features
Mass	~1500 kg	~1750-1850 kg	+17-23%	Increase due to additional feed system
Dimensions	Standard	+10-15% volume	+10-15%	Additional system and mixer
System complexity	Very high	Extremely high	Increased	Additional feed and control systems
Reliability	High	High with proper integration	Integration dependent	Requires additional safety system
Economic Aspects
Production cost	High	High + 15-20%	+15-20%	Additional components and complexity
Operating cost	High	Potentially lower with optimization	Potential reduction	Depends on solid component cost
Thrust/cost ratio	Baseline	Improved by 5-10%	+5-10%	With optimal design

Analysis of Theoretical Advantages

1. Increased thrust: Significant thrust increase (up to 30%) without substantial modification of the basic engine design
2. Expanded regulation range: Ability to both increase maximum thrust and provide finer regulation at low modes
3. Increased energy density: Solid fuel component adds energy without significant system volume increase
4. Improved start-up time: Faster achievement of nominal operating parameters
5. Usage flexibility: Ability to operate in different modes (liquid fuel only, with partial or full use of solid component)

Analysis of Theoretical Challenges

1. Thermal load: Increased combustion temperature requires additional cooling
2. Control system complexity: Need to synchronize three components instead of two
3. Additional mass: Increase in system starting mass due to additional components
4. Failure modes: New potential failure scenarios requiring analysis
5. Feed system complexity: Need to ensure uniform mixing of three components

Potential Applications

1. First stages of super heavy rockets: Using increased thrust to increase payload capacity
2. Emergency rescue systems: Quick start and high thrust for rescue systems
3. Military applications: Increased readiness and thrust for tactical systems
4. Research missions with high impulse requirements: Ability to operate in various modes for mission optimization

Conclusion

Theoretical calculations show that integrating a solid fuel paste delivery system into the Raptor engine can significantly improve its thrust characteristics with relatively small compromises in specific impulse. The main challenge lies in ensuring reliable component mixing, thermal load management, and system mass optimization.

Further research should focus on experimental confirmation of theoretical characteristics and development of optimal mixer design and solid fuel paste delivery system.