Let’s imagine that our world is a computer.
An interesting fact: if all known physical laws were described in the form of, for example, a computer program, the world would not be able to exist. There would be an instant avalanche-like process—the system would collapse.
But despite this, our world has an INFORMATIONAL nature.
All observable phenomena can be described in some way using what we, a bunch of pseudo-intelligent primates, consider to be science.
Empirically, magicians have established that our world is indeed similar to a computer.
FACT: NO MATTER HOW MUCH THE COMPUTER MAN DIGS THE SURFACE ON WHICH HE STANDS, HE WILL NEVER REACH THE HARD DRIVE!
CLASSICAL MODEL:
The classical magical theory of Kabbalah (Kabbalah is the science of system codes as programs) is based on the SEFIROT system (see the section on Sephirotic magic). The main idea of the “mainstream” is that each object in the system has a specific code that characterizes the object and is recorded in the form of a set of arcana. But I offer the following counterargument: let’s imagine a hammer (according to this logic, it has properties that determine its function), but let’s “suppose” we engrave a conventional magical symbol (non-Sephirotic) on it, or simply add some inscription that carries information, or change the striking surface—what will we get? According to the basic generally accepted theory of logic, the code should change, but not in all cases. When the surface changes, the function does not change either; when the inscription “hand drill” is engraved on it, the object will not change either, but we will be able to easily distinguish it from a hammer of the same model. And these objects will not be equal, i.e., identical, which, according to logic, should change the code. The classical interpretation of the Sephiroth contains 22 codes. Although, according to my calculations, there should be 25. That is, the theory is incomplete. Here, ancient Kh’Arian arithmetic comes to the rescue, which operates with a greater number of concepts (signs) than modern mathematics. If we add these concepts to the system of magic, everything falls into place – the equal sign (=) is replaced by the identity sign (denoted as = but with three lines). Objects are identical but not equal in some respects, and equal in others.
But in my research, I went even further, and here the difference in the amount of substance (NYU) from a school chemistry course—the number of atoms—can serve as an example.
