PREAMBULA
Based on the worldview taught in schools and universities, there exists a healthy approach to processing information known as logical (sound) reasoning. The laws of logic represent an inherent, inevitable, and essential connection between thoughts. Human thinking does not occur chaotically but follows specific logical principles. These laws of logic are objective, fundamental connections between forms of thought. They help construct proofs and prevent violations of the core principles of thinking and conducting discussions. Adhering to these laws ensures consistency and coherence, which, combined with semantic accuracy and ethical communication, creates a comfortable environment for verbal interaction, as participants mutually follow certain rules and norms of linguistic behavior (Wikipedia).
As a doctor, including in the field of psychiatry, I was taught that a mentally healthy person not only adheres to a logical approach to processing information but also instinctively strives to think this way. This type of thinking is legally applied by doctors to establish diagnoses and by lawyers and investigators during criminal investigations. Clearly, this approach excludes the deliberate ignoring of facts, even those that are displeasing. It follows that any mentally healthy person, free from psychological disorders, has the right to think as they do, provided their worldview is built on objective data. Any fair court must uphold a person’s right to think this way if they can substantiate their worldview with arguments.
Test 1
If the geographic and magnetic poles have switched places, it means the compass existed before this change, which implies that all official history is incorrect.
Test 2
The UN has “banned” conspiracy theories and conspiracism, but if I know facts that cannot be explained otherwise, then the UN is deliberately provoking a mental disorder in me.
